
251
ENSI Erfahrungs- und Forschungsbericht 2011
ter of the bed prevents the side coolant from flow-
ing into the center of the bed. For the bed with a
heap-like shape (cone) as shown in Figure 5b, the
dryout power density is 535 kW/m
3
. Surprisingly,
instead of increase in dryout power density, it de-
creases by 41 %, compared with the value of the
top-flooding bed (910 kW/m
3
). This is because the
heap-like bed has the height of around three times
the top-flooding bed, given the same mass of the
debris. The special geometry results in a high void
zone near the tip of the cone, where dryout oc-
curs first. Notably, due to the high rate of steam
flow through the tip, the dryout zone and its tem-
perature do not vary rapidly with increasing power
load. In other words, the steam flow plays a role
in coolability. An axially stratified debris bed with
a fine-particle layer settle atop a larger-size particle
layer is considered (see Figure 5c). The coolability
of such bed is determined by the top layer in top-
flooding scheme, since the capillary force across
the interface of the two layers prevents coolant
from reaching the lower layer. Such a barrier, how-
ever, can be alleviated if coolant is supplied from
the bottom through the annular gap as shown in
Figure 5c where it is assumed that a 200-mm-thick
layer with 0.5-mm-diameter particles sits atop a
474-mm-thick layer with 1-mm-diameter parti-
cles. The porosity is 0.45 for both layers. The dry-
out power density is calculated to be 356 kW/m
3
,
which is 63 % higher than the values (218 kW/m
3
)
of the top-flooding bed packed with the 0.5-mm-
diameter particles. The dryout positions for the
three beds can be seen in Figure 6. The co-current
two-phase flow in the multi-dimensional beds rais-
es the vulnerable location of dryout upward.
Extensive sensitivity-uncertainty analysis has been
performed for 1D debris bed coolability [12]. Cali-
brated «classical» model has been proposed based
on the optimization with regards to available ex-
perimental data. Comprehensive sensitivity analy-
sis suggests that up to 70 % of the uncertainty in
the debris bed coolability is due to the uncertainty
in the particle size distribution.
4. Progress in SERA Activity
The SERA study was focused on physical mecha-
nisms and material effects on triggerability and en-
ergetics of single droplet steam explosion.
The MISTEE experiment [13] using WO
3
-CaO mix-
ture as corium simulant provided data on the pro-
cesses in which the eutectic and non-eutectic com-
positions affect steam explosion energetics of a sin-
gle droplet. At lower superheat (100 °C) a notice-
able differences in preconditioning and conversion
ratio between the eutectic and non-eutectic melts
were observed. Such observations can be rational-
Figure 7:
Debris size distribution of
eutectic and non-eutectic
WO
3
-CaO melt droplets,
with a 100 °C superheat,
which underwent a steam
explosion.
Figure 8:
Morphology of the
fragmented debris.
Comentarios a estos manuales